ISO 9001 certification in progress RoHS material control Vietnam country-of-origin documentation rfq@saolamfg.comEmail WhatsApp +84 86 501 7914

Guide

How do you specify outdoor stainless parts so tea staining does not appear?

Short answer

Tea staining is the brown, rust-colored discoloration that forms on exterior stainless steel when airborne sea salt and other deposits sit on the surface, absorb moisture and attack the passive film locally. It is a form of light surface corrosion, usually cosmetic rather than structural, and it is controlled almost entirely by four choices a buyer can write down: the grade, the surface roughness and polishing direction, the final cleaning and passivation treatment, and a design that lets rain wash the part.

By Saola Manufacturing engineering team · Published · Updated

This guide is for the engineer or buyer who has just seen brown streaks on stainless brackets, handrail fittings, enclosure hardware, lighting housings or marine-adjacent equipment within months of installation, and who has to make sure the next lot does not do the same. The usual first reaction is to blame the supplier for “fake 316”. Sometimes that is right, but more often the grade was correct and the drawing simply said “stainless” or “No. 4 finish” and nothing about roughness, polishing direction, passivation or where salt would collect. The sections below run in the order you would work the problem: recognize it, rank the causes, diagnose the stained parts, choose the fix from a decision table, write it on the drawing and RFQ, and see how the work is split on a Saola order.

On this page

What does tea staining look like, and how is it different from rust or pitting?

Tea staining shows up as a light tan to brown film or streaks on exposed stainless surfaces, heaviest on sheltered faces, horizontal ledges, crevices and along coarse polishing lines. Unlike red rust from embedded iron or deep pitting, it usually wipes or cleans off and leaves sound metal underneath.

The Australian Stainless Steel Development Association (ASSDA) describes tea staining as a coastal phenomenon that occurs most commonly within about five kilometers of surf, grows worse closer to the marine source, and can extend much further inland with wind, pollution and heat (ASSDA, preventing coastal corrosion). The pattern on the part is the best clue. Stain that follows the grain of a brushed finish, collects under a lip, in the gap between a fitting and its tube or on the underside of a horizontal rail is classic tea staining, because those are the places that hold salt and are not rinsed by rain.

Three look-alikes need to be ruled out before anyone changes the specification. Isolated orange spots that bleed, often in a pattern matching handling or a grinding operation, point to free iron from carbon steel tools, wire brushes or shop dust rather than to the environment. A straw, blue or brown band beside a weld is heat tint from welding, which is a separate fabrication issue. And small dark pits that remain after cleaning are pitting corrosion, which is a sign that the grade is under-matched to the site, not just a cosmetic problem. Tea staining can coexist with all three, so look at more than one part and more than one face before deciding.

What causes tea staining on coastal stainless parts?

Ranked by how often they decide the outcome: a grade too lean for the site, a surface that is too rough or polished across the rain path, sheltered or crevice-forming geometry that never gets rain-washed, contamination or missing passivation after the last machining or polishing step, and no washing in service.

  1. Grade too lean for the exposure. ASSDA guidance is to use grade 316 or an equivalent as a minimum within five kilometers of surf and to step up to duplex 2205 or super duplex grades for splash zones, unwashed areas or rough surfaces, noting that 304 and 430 will probably become tea stained in marine environments (ASSDA). The International Molybdenum Association likewise reports that 316 works at typical coastal sites but can show light tea staining in severe locations without finish or design changes, and that 2205 is needed there when a pristine appearance is expected (IMOA, 2015).
  2. Surface roughness and polishing direction. Per industry guidance from ASSDA (ASSDA), cut or abraded surfaces have a threshold near 0.5 µm Ra, and staining risk falls sharply below it, so a roughness under that value is the recommended target. A No. 4 callout on its own does not pin down roughness, so ASSDA treats it as an incomplete specification unless an Ra limit goes with it. Deep grooves hold salt, and horizontal abrasion lines on a vertical face act as tiny ledges.
  3. Sheltered and crevice geometry. IMOA lists sheltered areas that cannot be rain-washed, and light salt-laden mist that dampens without cleaning, among the conditions that make a coastal site severe. Lips, overlaps, blind pockets, gaps under fasteners and upward-facing recesses all collect deposits.
  4. Contamination and missing passivation. Embedded iron from carbon steel tooling, abrasive residues and exposed sulfide inclusions on machined bar surfaces weaken the passive film. ASSDA notes that bar product carries much more sulfur than sheet or plate and that an oxidizing passivation after final metal removal substantially improves corrosion resistance (ASSDA, seven ways to prevent tea staining).
  5. No washing in service. Salt keeps working as long as it stays on the surface. Chloride salts absorb moisture from the air, so a salted surface stays damp well after the weather has dried, as the same ASSDA article explains.

Warm climates make every factor worse. ASSDA cites the general rule that corrosion rates roughly double for every 10°C rise in temperature, all else being equal (ASSDA), and the coastal-corrosion bulletin adds that higher temperatures can push tea staining 20 km or more inland. That is one reason the same grade and finish can stay bright on a cool coast and stain on a hot, humid one.

How do you diagnose stained parts and find the real cause?

Map where the stain is, clean a test patch, check what is underneath, verify the grade and measure the roughness. Those five checks separate a specification problem from a supplier nonconformance and tell you which fix to apply.

  1. Map the pattern. Photograph each stained part in its installed orientation, and compare stained and clean faces of the same part: if they share one bar, one finish and one treatment, the difference is exposure. Stain concentrated on sheltered faces, crevices and along the polish lines points to environment plus finish; random spots that do not follow exposure point to contamination.
  2. Clean a test patch. Use mild detergent and warm water, then a fresh-water rinse, which is the first-line cleaning that ASSDA recommends. If the stain lifts and the surface beneath is bright and smooth, it was superficial tea staining.
  3. Inspect under magnification. Look at the cleaned patch with a loupe. Pits, etched grain lines or crevice attack mean the grade or design is under-matched to the site, not just the finish.
  4. Verify the grade. Compare the mill certificate with a handheld XRF reading on the stained part. Grade 316 is specified with about 2 to 3 percent molybdenum and 304 has no molybdenum requirement, so a molybdenum reading near zero is a quick and objective way to catch a grade substitution.
  5. Measure the roughness. Take a stylus profilometer reading across the polishing lines on the stained face and compare it with the drawing. If the drawing had no roughness limit, the result tells you what to add.
  6. Test for free iron if spots look like rust. ASTM A380 includes tests for free iron such as water-wetting and drying, high-humidity, copper sulfate and ferroxyl tests. For a simple field check where contamination is suspected, ASSDA suggests several misting and drying cycles with tap water, and the ferroxyl test of ASTM A380 for critical work (ASSDA; ASTM A380/A380M-25). Positive results on new, uninstalled parts point to fabrication or handling, which is a supplier corrective action.

Record the findings against the purchase order. If the parts meet a drawing that never stated grade limits, roughness or passivation, the nonconformance is in the specification and the fix belongs on the next revision. If the drawing stated them and the parts do not meet them, the lot is nonconforming and the supplier owes containment and a corrective action.

Which grade, finish and treatment prevent tea staining at your site?

Match the grade to the exposure first, then hold the exposed surfaces to a smooth finish with the polishing lines running in the direction rain drains, and finish with passivation or electropolishing after the last metal removal. Use the table below as the starting decision, and confirm the site with a corrosivity assessment when the stakes are high.

ASSDA expresses the grade step as a target Pitting Resistance Equivalent number, calculated as %Cr + 3.3 × %Mo + 16 × %N: about 18 away from marine influence, about 24 in marine atmospheres and about 34 in severe marine atmospheres (ASSDA). Those targets line up with 304, 316 and 2205 respectively. ISO 9223 gives the formal language for the site itself, ranking atmospheric corrosivity from C1 to CX, with coastal sites typically falling in the upper categories depending on chloride deposition (ISO 9223:2012).

Grade, finish and treatment by exposure · corrosivity language per ISO 9223:2012; grade, PRE and roughness guidance from ASSDA (2010, 2023) and IMOA (2015); finish designations per ASTM A480/A480M-25
ExposureGrade (PRE target)Exposed surface finishFinal treatmentMaintenance
Inland urban or rural, no marine influence304 / 304L (about 18)Clean machined or brushed finish; roughness limit optionalPassivate per ASTM A967 after final machiningRain washing usually enough
Coastal, boldly exposed and rain-washed, beyond about 5 km of surf316 / 316L minimum (about 24)Ra 0.5 µm max on exposed faces; polish lines verticalPassivate per ASTM A967Wash when adjacent glass is cleaned
Within about 5 km of surf or 1 km of calm salt water316 / 316L minimum (about 24); 2205 where appearance is criticalRa 0.5 µm max, or finer; polish lines vertical; avoid coarse No. 4 without an Ra limitElectropolish per ASTM B912, or passivate per ASTM A967Scheduled washing with fresh water and mild detergent
Sheltered or unwashed coastal faces, salt fog, splash zone, hot and humid2205 duplex (about 34) or super duplexSmoothest practical: electropolished or mirror (No. 8 mirror)Electropolish per ASTM B912Frequent washing; design out ledges and crevices

Finish direction. Specify that brushed or abraded lines run vertically in the installed position, so water and salt drain along the grain instead of sitting in it. ASSDA lists horizontal abrasion lines on vertical surfaces among the features that raise corrosivity (ASSDA).

Electropolish or passivate? Both remove free iron and leave a chromium-rich passive film; electropolishing also levels micro-peaks, and ASSDA reports excellent tea staining resistance from electropolished surfaces even where Ra drops only slightly (ASSDA). For a machined part, the choice and its effect on dimensions are covered in the electropolishing vs passivation guide. Avoid free-machining 303 for coastal exterior parts; its added sulfur that makes it easy to machine also lowers its corrosion resistance, as the 303 vs 304 guide explains.

Cleaning existing stains. Mild stains usually come off with detergent, warm water and a soft cloth, followed by a clean-water rinse; ASSDA warns against abrasive cleaners, chloride cleaners, bleach and hydrochloric acid on stainless steel. Wiping the washed surface dry improves the result. If detergent does not lift it, ASSDA's view is that mechanical polishing alone is unlikely to remove the stain and stop it returning, and that chemical cleaning and passivation is usually the most effective treatment, with pastes and gels available for work on site (ASSDA). Pickling pastes contain nitric and hydrofluoric acid, so that step belongs with a trained contractor and a written safety and rinse procedure, not with maintenance staff. Cleaning removes the symptom; if the grade, finish or design is wrong for the site, the stain will return.

What should the drawing, RFQ and PO say so tea staining does not recur?

Write the exposure, the exact grade, a measurable roughness limit with lay direction on the exposed faces, the final treatment by specification, and the handling and packing rules; a callout of “marine grade stainless, brushed finish” leaves every one of those decisions to someone else.

  • Service exposure. “Exterior, coastal, within 2 km of surf; sheltered faces noted.” A supplier can flag a risk only if it knows the site.
  • Material. “UNS S31603 bar per ASTM A276, mill certificate required” or, for severe sites, “UNS S32205.” Do not accept “18-8” or “marine grade” as a material callout, and see the 304 vs 316 guide for when 316 is needed.
  • Roughness and lay. Put a surface texture symbol on each exposed face with a maximum Ra and the lay symbol showing the direction, which is vertical in the installed position. The symbol and lay notation are defined in ASME Y14.36; the surface finish symbol guide shows how to draw it.
  • Final treatment. “Passivate per ASTM A967, method and verification test to be stated on the certificate” or “Electropolish per ASTM B912 after final machining.” Name which surfaces are masked, if any.
  • Contamination control. “No contact with carbon steel tools, brushes or fixtures on finished surfaces; no chloride-containing cleaners.”
  • Packing. Require clean, dry packing that keeps finished faces apart and away from carbon steel, because shipping damage and contact rust are easily mistaken for tea staining on arrival.
  • Records. Ask for the material certificate, a roughness report on the exposed faces and the passivation or electropolishing certificate with each lot.
  • Design notes. Remove ledges, add drain paths and open up crevices at the design review, and mark any face that will be sheltered in service so it can be finished to the stricter row of the table.

Who does what on a Saola order for outdoor stainless parts?

Machining and mechanical polishing are done at our lead CNC plant, T.K Viet Nam Precision Company Limited. Passivation and electropolishing are not on our published finishing menu today, so name them on the RFQ anyway and the quote states plainly whether that step is included, never dropping it silently, and gives the production site and country of origin for any partner-plant step.

The lead plant has run since 2017 with machining centers, CNC lathes, EDM, welding, and grinding and polishing, so exterior stainless fittings and brackets are cut on the CNC turning and CNC milling lines. Whether a stated roughness and lay direction on an exposed face can be reached by machining and polishing is confirmed on the quote, not assumed. The surface finishing page lists the finishes partner plants apply today. Partner plants are not named, they are not necessarily in Vietnam, and the production site and country of origin are stated on each quote.

The checklist in the previous section is what helps most at the RFQ stage: exposure, grade, roughness and lay, treatment specification, contamination and packing rules, and the records you need. Parts are inspected against those written requirements before they ship. ISO 9001 certification is in progress, not held. Send the drawing through the quote form.

Frequently asked

Is tea staining a sign that the stainless steel is failing?

Usually not. It is a superficial corrosion film that affects appearance rather than strength. Check under it after cleaning, though: pits or crevice attack mean the grade or design is not right for the site.

Does 316 stainless always prevent tea staining?

No. Industry guidance treats 316 as the minimum near the coast, not a guarantee. A rough or horizontally polished finish, sheltered geometry or no washing can still let 316 stain, and severe sites may need duplex 2205.

Is a No. 4 brushed finish good enough for coastal parts?

Only if a roughness limit is stated with it. The No. 4 designation alone allows a range of roughness, and ASSDA warns it is inadequate for coastal use unless the roughness is specified too.

Will passivation remove tea staining that is already there?

Clean first, then passivate. Passivation restores the passive film after cleaning, but it is not a stain remover, and it will not fix a grade or finish that is wrong for the site.

Can a coating stop tea staining?

Oils or waxes temporarily keep chlorides off the surface, but ASSDA notes they must be renewed and tend to attract debris and dull the finish. The durable fix is the right grade, a smooth finish with vertical lay, a proper final treatment and a design that rain can wash.

Have a drawing for this? Send it for a quote.

STEP or PDF, one part or a whole family. You get a unit price at your volume, the tooling cost, and a short manufacturability note.