Guide
How much die casting machining allowance should you leave on a machined face?
Die casting machining allowance is the extra metal a designer adds to a cast surface so that a later machining pass can bring it to its finished size, flatness and finish. It is also called machining stock. On a high-pressure die casting the right answer is usually “as little as the process will reliably allow”, because the best metal in the part sits in a thin skin at the surface.
By Saola Manufacturing engineering team · Published · Updated
This guide is for engineers who draw cast-and-machined parts such as housings, brackets, valve bodies and covers, and for sourcing managers who have to check that a supplier’s casting drawing matches the machined part. It explains what the allowance has to absorb, how to size it face by face, how the ISO casting standards express it, and what to put on the drawing.
The NADCA Product Specification Standards and the ISO 8062 series are paid documents. This page uses only what their publishers make public and does not reproduce their tables. Where a number appears, its source is named next to it.
On this page
What does the machining allowance on a die casting have to cover?
It has to cover every way the cast surface can end up away from its nominal position, plus the minimum depth a cutter needs to leave a clean, fully machined surface. If any one of those is left out, some castings in the lot will show a black, unmachined patch on a face that should be bright.
Think of the allowance as a budget with separate lines. Each line is a reason the real surface may sit higher or lower than the model says:
- The as-cast tolerance of that surface. A die casting is not exactly its nominal size, and the stock must cover the case where the surface is cast at the low side of its tolerance.
- Features that cross the parting line or a moving core. NADCA notes that flash at the parting line changes dimensions measured across it, and recommends keeping critical dimensions in one die half (NADCA, parting line). A machined face located from a datum in the other die half needs extra stock for that shift.
- Draft. Walls parallel to the die opening are tapered, so a face that must be machined square over its full depth has more metal at one end than the other.
- Distortion. Flatness and straightness errors from cooling and ejection, which grow with the size of the face.
- Location error in the fixture. The casting is clamped against cast surfaces, and any error in those surfaces moves the whole machined pattern.
- Clean-up. The small depth below which a cutter rubs instead of cutting, or leaves the cast texture visible in low spots.
The cutter does not care which of these lines produced the extra metal. The designer does, because the lines that dominate tell you where to spend effort: tighter casting control, a better datum scheme, or more stock.
Why is less stock usually better on a die casting?
Because the densest, strongest and least porous metal in a die casting is the outer skin, and every extra amount of stock moves the finished face deeper into the porous core. A generous allowance that is harmless on a forging or a bar-stock part can be the direct cause of open pores on a die-cast sealing face.
NADCA describes the skin effect: the metal against the die steel freezes fastest, forms a fine-grained layer stronger than the metal beneath it, and that rapid freezing tends to push porosity toward the center of the section. NADCA gives the skin a typical depth of 0.015 to 0.020 in (0.38 to 0.50 mm) (NADCA, structural criteria).
Put that next to an allowance budget and the design tension is plain. A light clean-up pass can stay inside the skin; a heavy pass that has to absorb large casting variation cannot. This is also why NADCA says die castings typically require few, if any, finish machining operations (NADCA, secondary processing): the process is meant to cast features close to size, and each machined face is an exception that should be justified.
The practical rule is to shrink the budget lines, not to pad the total. Hold the cast dimension of a machined face closely, reference it from datums in the same die half, and keep heavy pads off sealing faces. A pore opened by a deep cut on a sealing face is rarely fixed by cutting deeper still.
How do you work out the allowance for one machined face?
Add the clean-up depth to the worst-case low position of the cast surface, measured from the datums the machining fixture will actually use. Do it face by face, because a small face close to the datums needs far less stock than a large face across the parting line.
A simple worksheet for each machined face:
- Pick the machining datums first. Name the cast surfaces the fixture will locate on. The allowance is only meaningful relative to those surfaces.
- Take the as-cast tolerance of the face relative to those datums. For an equal-bilateral tolerance, half of the band is the amount the surface can sit low.
- Add the draft effect if the face runs along the die opening. The extra metal at the thick end is the depth of the wall multiplied by the tangent of the draft angle. With tan 1° close to 0.0175, each degree of draft adds a little under two hundredths of the wall depth.
- Add a flatness allowance for large faces and a parting-line allowance if the face and its datums are in different die halves.
- Add the clean-up depth your machining process needs to produce the specified surface texture.
- Check the total against the skin. If the result is well beyond the skin depth reported by NADCA, look for a way to reduce the variation instead of accepting a deep cut on a critical face.
Straight addition is the conservative method and suits low volumes and first articles. On a stable production process some teams combine the variation terms statistically, but that needs real measured data from the die, not assumptions. Whichever method you use, write the resulting cast dimension on the casting drawing so the die caster and the machinist are working to the same number.
The same thinking applies to cored holes. A hole cored close to size keeps its skin, and a light reaming or boring pass only corrects the draft taper. NADCA notes that holes need more draft than any other die-cast feature because the casting shrinks onto the core pin (NADCA, holes and windows), so the stock on the wall of a cored hole is set largely by that taper.
How do ISO casting standards express machining allowance?
ISO 8062-3 gives a system of casting tolerance grades and machining allowance grades that a drawing can call up in a general note near the title block. ISO 8062-4 covers the same need for drawings toleranced with surface profiles to a general datum system.
In plain terms, ISO 8062-3 is the part of the series you use when a cast part is dimensioned with plus/minus values: it lets one note set both how far the raw casting may vary and how much stock sits on the faces to be cut, and it is written to cover every cast metal and casting method rather than die casting alone. Its linear tolerance grades carry the prefix DCTG; the 2023 revision, for example, renamed grade DCTG 16 to DCTG 15wt to clarify wall thickness (ISO 8062-3:2023; the grade change is listed in BSI's summary of changes for BS EN ISO 8062-3:2023). The allowance itself is chosen as a grade, so the drawing states a grade rather than a single number for every face.
NADCA publishes its own standard and precision tolerances in the Product Specification Standards, with coordinate dimensioning and geometric dimensioning in separate sections (NADCA, Product Specification Standards). North American die casters usually quote against NADCA tolerances, and the tolerance guide explains how those grades are organized. Whichever system you use, the as-cast tolerance you pick feeds directly into the allowance.
| Reference | What it covers | How it helps with stock |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 8062-3:2023 | Grades for size and form variation plus stock grades, for cast parts dimensioned with plus/minus values | Calls up a casting tolerance grade and a machining allowance grade in one general note |
| ISO 8062-4:2023 | Profile-based general tolerancing tied to a datum system, with stock and draft covered too | Suits drawings built on a datum system; not applicable when cast datum surfaces are machined |
| ISO/TS 8062-2:2013 | Rules for dimensional and geometrical tolerances of molded parts | Defines the delivered condition that ISO 8062-3 applies to |
| ISO 10135:2007 | Drawing indications and symbols for molded parts | Standard way to show cast and machined conditions on one drawing |
| ISO 21920-1:2021 | Indication of surface texture by graphical symbols (replaces ISO 1302) | Marks which surfaces require material removal and to what texture |
| NADCA structural criteria | The dense skin and where porosity collects | Explains why deep stock on a die casting risks exposing pores |
How should the drawing show machining stock and datums?
Show the casting and the machined part as two defined conditions, and choose cast datums that stay on the part or are machined first in a known sequence. A single drawing that shows only the finished part leaves the die caster to guess how much metal to add.
There are two common layouts. One is a separate casting drawing, with the stock already added to every machined face, plus a machining drawing of the finished part. The other is a single combined drawing that shows the finished geometry and marks the cast outline and allowance on each machined face, which is what the symbols in ISO 10135 are for (ISO 10135:2007 scope). Either works; what fails is a finished-part drawing with no statement of the cast condition.
Datums deserve the most care. The first machining operation has to locate on cast surfaces, so pick surfaces that are flat, well away from the parting line and gates, and in the same die half as the faces they locate. Small cast locating pads, bosses or datum targets make fixturing repeatable and can be kept out of cosmetic areas. ISO 8062-4 states that it does not apply when cast datum surfaces are machined (ISO 8062-4:2023 scope), which is a useful reminder that once a datum is cut, the tolerance scheme has to say what the new datum is.
Finally, mark every machined surface with the texture symbol that requires material removal, per ISO 21920-1 or ASME Y14.36 as your drawing system uses, and leave the rest as cast. That makes the allowance visible, and it stops a supplier from machining faces that were meant to keep their skin.
Do zinc and aluminum die castings need different allowances?
The method is the same, but zinc usually needs fewer machined faces and less stock where it is machined, because it casts closer to final form. The allowance follows the casting variation, and zinc alloys tend to have less of it.
NADCA notes that zinc alloys can often hold precision features such as zero draft as cast, where aluminum would need draft and a machining pass (NADCA, alloy selection). For a Zamak 3 part, the first question is often whether the face needs machining at all. For an aluminum part in ADC12 or A380, expect more faces to need a clean-up pass, and pay more attention to draft on deep walls and to flatness on large faces.
Alloy also changes how the cut behaves. In NADCA’s aluminum alloy comparison table, machining is rated from 1 (most desirable) to 5: 518 scores 1, 383 scores 2, 360, 380 and 384 score 3, 413 scores 4, and both 390 and 443 score 5 (NADCA, aluminum alloys). The ADC12 vs A380 guide sets out how the common aluminum grades compare.
What should you agree with an offshore supplier about machining stock?
Agree the casting drawing, the machining datums and the first-article checks before the die is built, because the die fixes the stock for its whole life. Changing an allowance later means changing die steel.
When parts come from Vietnam or anywhere far from your plant, three things prevent most disputes. First, confirm who owns the casting drawing and who approves it, especially if casting and machining happen at different companies. Second, ask for a first-article report that measures the remaining stock on each machined face across several cavities or shots, not only the finished dimensions. Third, section a first-article part through the critical faces so you can see whether the cut stayed in dense metal.
Having one supplier answer for both casting and machining shortens that loop, because a face that will not clean up can be traced to a die, a cavity and a shot while the cause is still fresh. Saola sources die castings in ADC12 aluminum and Zamak 3 zinc from partner foundries it manages and machines them on the CNC milling and CNC turning equipment at its lead CNC plant; the quote names the production site and origin. ISO 9001 certification is in progress, not yet held. The RFQ preparation guide lists what else to include, and you can send the drawing for a quote with the machined faces marked.
Frequently asked
Is machining allowance the same as tolerance?
No. Tolerance is how far a dimension may vary. Allowance is extra metal added on purpose so a surface can be machined, and it has to be larger than the casting tolerance it absorbs.
Is allowance stated per side or on the diameter?
Say which on the drawing. Allowance on a flat face is per side; on a bore or a turned diameter, state clearly whether the value is radial or on the diameter, because the two differ by a factor of two.
Can I just leave generous stock to be safe?
Not on a die casting. Extra stock cuts through the dense skin into the zone where porosity collects, adds cycle time and wastes metal. Reduce the variation instead.
Should machined faces be on the cover or ejector side of the die?
Keep a machined face and the datums it is located from in the same die half where you can. That removes the parting-line shift from the stack-up.
What if the drawing only shows the finished part?
Then the supplier has to add the stock, and you should ask to approve their casting drawing before the die is built so you can check the datums and allowance face by face.
Sources
- Structural Criteria: Mechanical Properties and the Skin Effect, NADCA Design, North American Die Casting Association, accessed September 2026 (citing Borland and Tsumagari, NADCA Transaction T06-031, 2006)
- Secondary Processing Costs, NADCA Design, accessed September 2026
- Parting Line, NADCA Design, accessed September 2026
- Holes and Windows, NADCA Design, accessed September 2026
- Alloy Selection, NADCA Design, accessed September 2026
- Aluminum Alloys, NADCA Design, accessed September 2026
- Product Specifications Standards for Die Castings (table of contents), NADCA Design, accessed September 2026
- ISO 8062-3:2023, general dimensional and geometrical tolerances and machining allowances for castings (abstract), ISO, edition 2, published February 2023, accessed September 2026; summary of changes from the BSI Knowledge record for BS EN ISO 8062-3:2023, published March 2023
- ISO 8062-3:2023 (scope), catalog listing, issued February 2023, accessed September 2026
- ISO 8062-4:2023, rules and general tolerances for castings using profile tolerancing (scope), catalog listing, issued May 2023, accessed September 2026
- ISO/TS 8062-2:2013, rules, catalog listing, issued July 2013, accessed September 2026
- ISO 10135:2007, drawing indications for molded parts (scope), catalog listing, issued November 2007, accessed September 2026
- ISO 21920-1:2021, indication of surface texture (scope), catalog listing, issued December 2021, accessed September 2026